Hearing Loss Recruitment



How are real films like the upcoming "Stop-Loss" in relation to the war in Iraq?

I've heard some things really fishy about U.S. Army Recruitment in Iraq (in particular around the deceit of the new recruits so they do not really know what they're getting), and I'm wondering how much of this is real vs. artistic license taken by the directors. Thanks, sorry if this question is worded strangely, I'm a little unsure about what to say.

Some of it is very realistic, but most of the action scenes do not are. The two parties have such stories to tell. U.S. military films are dedicated to the Marines trying to free a part of the world to the 'good common ', there will be a ruthless bad guy, the enemy will fuckloads lower, but when an American dies everything will be like "OH MY GOD! NOOOO, this is murder! "and then the kid is going to explode some terrorists. A film from the terrorist point of view would be all about this great powerful nation (America) attacking a much smaller country weaker than its oil. The Americans who abuse the locals and be gung, ho gross gun happy. With most American films of the details are perfect, as what really happened, but the total U.S. from the point of view. Notice how whenever a U.S. soldier theres is shot playing sad music? The details are perfect, but they portray that this is completely unrealistic, taking all the bad things the U.S. soldiers did just putting things in their heroic and putting in only the bad things their enemies were.

just inform your US Congress about “acquire language”


Leave a Reply